Some of it, I maintain, is common sense. Others, may
characterize it, perhaps correctly, as cheapness.
When I worked in downtown Chicago, I sometimes ordered lunch
online. No matter how busy I was or what the weather was like, I always walked
to pick it up. I could never justify the cost of delivery.
If pressed, or even if not, I felt pretty good about
myself – maybe even a touch smug – when I would observe delivery people taking
lunches to office buildings throughout the city.
Of course, if I really wanted to save money, I could have
made my lunch at home or limited my 7-Eleven runs. But the point of this post is
not my financial inconsistencies, it’s food delivery people!
Which brings us to one of my favorite articles of 2020.
It involves food delivery, arbitrage, the peculiar incentives of startup
economy, zero interest-rate policy (ZIRP) and demonstrates that there may, indeed, be a free lunch after all.
Or at least free pizza.
Ranjan Roy, one of the co-authors of the Margins Newsletter, wrote a fun,
creative and brilliant article. He opened it this way. “If capitalism is driven
by a search for profit, the food delivery business confuses the hell out of me.
Every platform loses money. Restaurants feel like they’re getting screwed.
Delivery drivers are poster children for gig economy problems. Customers get
annoyed about delivery fees. Isn’t business supposed to solve problems?”
Roy proceeds to tell a story about a friend of his who
owns pizza restaurants. The friend, by choice, did not offer delivery. So why did
he receive complaints from customers who said their pizza was delivered cold?
It turned out, without his permission, DoorDash had
created a delivery option on his Google Listing. The friend asked Roy what he
knew about DoorDash and he replied with this classic line about the business
model of many 21st century aspiring tech disrupters. “Raise a ton of
money, lose a ton of money, and just obliterate the basic economics of an
industry.”
It gets better.
DoorDash charged $16 for the same pizza the owner listed
as $24. Roy writes that based on the way the restaurant’s website was set up,
it appeared DoorDash mistakenly used the price for a cheese pizza and applied
it to pizza with multiple toppings.
Roy said it was time for his friend to start making
pizzas, selling them to DoorDash and start booking $8 of profit per pizza.
He convinced the owner to place an order for 10 pizzas with
instructions to deliver them to a friend. The owner charged $160 to his credit
card and a DoorDash driver arrived at the restaurant and paid $240 for the
pizzas. Roy joked with his friend that he should, “run this arbitrage over and
over. You could massively even grow your top-line revenue while netting
riskless profit, and maybe even get acquired at an inflated valuation.”
For the next experiment/arbitrage/pizza order, they prepared pizzas with just dough. This would increase the profit
even more, provided DoorDash did not catch on.
Surely, DoorDash would, right?
Tear up your trusty econmics texbook and read the whole thing to find the answer. Roy walks us off with what may well be, "the
greatest ZIRP story ever told."
No comments:
Post a Comment